You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘mStonerblog’ category.

mStonerblog http://www.mstonerblog.com/index.php/blog/comments/marketing_to_teens_email_in_an_era_of_social_media/#When:14:02:01Z

by Michael Stoner

“Teens use text messages, IM, and Facebook to communicate, not email. So that must be the best way to solicit them.”

Well, duh! Sounds like pretty much of a no-brainer: and, in fact, I’ve heard and read variations of that statement repeated in the last several weeks by a number of people who are responsible for communicating with teens on behalf of college and university admissions offices.

The fact is, though, it may not be true.

According to a new study by the Ball State Center for Media Design and ExactTarget, while 42 percent of teens prefer to text each other, 62 percent prefer to receive promotions via email vs. 1 percent who prefer to receive them by text.

For this study, the research partners developed personas–seven distinct groups of people who use media in different ways and prefer different types of communications. Teens 15-17 use “all things digital” and consume media simultaneously–IMing, social networking, texting, watching TV. Teens do use email, but they much prefer other media:
Their use of IM, text messaging, and participation in social networking is significantly more than any other cohort. Our research shows that 77% use IM (64% more than other groups), 76% participate in social networking sites (more than twice the average), and 70% text message (67% higher than average). Additionally, 42% of Teens prefer text messaging for personal communication, 27% still prefer email for personal communication, 16% prefer IM, and 8% communicate through social networking sites.

While teens don’t do a lot of shopping online–yet–they are similar to other groups (college students, working adults, etc.) in prefering traditional direct marketing channels for marketing communications, including direct mail and email.
Only 13 percent of teens have made a purchase influenced by text marketing and 12 percent have made a purchase resulting from marketing through a social networking site. There is definitely some momentum toward these channels among teens, bu when it comes to driving conversions, email still outperforms the influence of text messaging, social networks, and IM combined.

And, “direct mail is universally seen as the most appropriate channel for marketers to communicate with them, and Teens say direct mail has had more influence on purchasing than any other direct marketing channel.”

Having noted that, however, here’s an important caveat: the key concept is to put the audience in control. For ExactTarget (an email marketing firm), that means marketers should “ … communicate with each subscriber with content, frequency, and media selection that meets their stated preferences.

More good insights in the white paper [this link takes you to a registration form; you register and receive the white paper for free].

Ball State Center for Media Design is a research and development facility focused on the creation, testing, and practical application of digital technologies for business, classroom, home, and community.

 

“Teens use text messages, IM, and Facebook to communicate, not email. So that must be the best way to solicit them.”Well, duh! Sounds like pretty much of a no-brainer: and, in fact, I’ve heard and read variations of that statement repeated in the last several weeks by a number of people who are responsible for communicating with teens on behalf of college and university admissions offices.

The fact is, though, it may not be true.

According to a new study by the Ball State Center for Media Design and ExactTarget, while 42 percent of teens prefer to text each other, 62 percent prefer to receive promotions via email vs. 1 percent who prefer to receive them by text.

For this study, the research partners developed personas–seven distinct groups of people who use media in different ways and prefer different types of communications. Teens 15-17 use “all things digital” and consume media simultaneously–IMing, social networking, texting, watching TV. Teens do use email, but they much prefer other media:

Their use of IM, text messaging, and participation in social networking is significantly more than any other cohort. Our research shows that 77% use IM (64% more than other groups), 76% participate in social networking sites (more than twice the average), and 70% text message (67% higher than average). Additionally, 42% of Teens prefer text messaging for personal communication, 27% still prefer email for personal communication, 16% prefer IM, and 8% communicate through social networking sites.

While teens don’t do a lot of shopping online–yet–they are similar to other groups (college students, working adults, etc.) in prefering traditional direct marketing channels for marketing communications, including direct mail and email.

Only 13 percent of teens have made a purchase influenced by text marketing and 12 percent have made a purchase resulting from marketing through a social networking site. There is definitely some momentum toward these channels among teens, bu when it comes to driving conversions, email still outperforms the influence of text messaging, social networks, and IM combined.

And, “direct mail is universally seen as the most appropriate channel for marketers to communicate with them, and Teens say direct mail has had more influence on purchasing than any other direct marketing channel.”

Having noted that, however, here’s an important caveat: the key concept is to put the audience in control. For ExactTarget (an email marketing firm), that means marketers should “ … communicate with each subscriber with content, frequency, and media selection that meets their stated preferences.

More good insights in the white paper [this link takes you to a registration form; you register and receive the white paper for free].

Ball State Center for Media Design is a research and development facility focused on the creation, testing, and practical application of digital technologies for business, classroom, home, and community.

Who Are We

Insight and Research at the Center for Media Design (CMD) has begun to receive quite a bit of attention from industry publications and mainstream media outlets in the last several years as a groundbreaking and reputable media research organization. This archive is only for educational purpose, if the content involved any copyright issue, please contact: Michelle Prieb: meprieb@bsu.edu
May 2017
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

Categories

Insight and research in the News